Using Admission Controllers

This page provides an overview of Admission Controllers.

What are they?

An admission controller is a piece of code that intercepts requests to the Kubernetes API server prior to persistence of the object, but after the request is authenticated and authorized. The controllers consist of the list below, are compiled into the kube-apiserver binary, and may only be configured by the cluster administrator. In that list, there are two special controllers: MutatingAdmissionWebhook and ValidatingAdmissionWebhook. These execute the mutating and validating (respectively) admission control webhooks which are configured in the API.

Admission controllers may be “validating”, “mutating”, or both. Mutating controllers may modify the objects they admit; validating controllers may not.

Admission controllers limit requests to create, delete, modify or connect to (proxy). They do not support read requests.

The admission control process proceeds in two phases. In the first phase, mutating admission controllers are run. In the second phase, validating admission controllers are run. Note again that some of the controllers are both.

If any of the controllers in either phase reject the request, the entire request is rejected immediately and an error is returned to the end-user.

Finally, in addition to sometimes mutating the object in question, admission controllers may sometimes have side effects, that is, mutate related resources as part of request processing. Incrementing quota usage is the canonical example of why this is necessary. Any such side-effect needs a corresponding reclamation or reconciliation process, as a given admission controller does not know for sure that a given request will pass all of the other admission controllers.

Why do I need them?

Many advanced features in Kubernetes require an admission controller to be enabled in order to properly support the feature. As a result, a Kubernetes API server that is not properly configured with the right set of admission controllers is an incomplete server and will not support all the features you expect.

How do I turn on an admission controller?

The Kubernetes API server flag enable-admission-plugins takes a comma-delimited list of admission control plugins to invoke prior to modifying objects in the cluster. For example, the following command line enables the NamespaceLifecycle and the LimitRanger admission control plugins:

  1. kube-apiserver --enable-admission-plugins=NamespaceLifecycle,LimitRanger ...

Note: Depending on the way your Kubernetes cluster is deployed and how the API server is started, you may need to apply the settings in different ways. For example, you may have to modify the systemd unit file if the API server is deployed as a systemd service, you may modify the manifest file for the API server if Kubernetes is deployed in a self-hosted way.

How do I turn off an admission controller?

The Kubernetes API server flag disable-admission-plugins takes a comma-delimited list of admission control plugins to be disabled, even if they are in the list of plugins enabled by default.

  1. kube-apiserver --disable-admission-plugins=PodNodeSelector,AlwaysDeny ...

Which plugins are enabled by default?

To see which admission plugins are enabled:

  1. kube-apiserver -h | grep enable-admission-plugins

In the current version, the default ones are:

  1. NamespaceLifecycle, LimitRanger, ServiceAccount, TaintNodesByCondition, Priority, DefaultTolerationSeconds, DefaultStorageClass, StorageObjectInUseProtection, PersistentVolumeClaimResize, RuntimeClass, CertificateApproval, CertificateSigning, CertificateSubjectRestriction, DefaultIngressClass, MutatingAdmissionWebhook, ValidatingAdmissionWebhook, ResourceQuota

What does each admission controller do?

AlwaysAdmit

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [deprecated]

This admission controller allows all pods into the cluster. It is deprecated because its behavior is the same as if there were no admission controller at all.

AlwaysPullImages

This admission controller modifies every new Pod to force the image pull policy to Always. This is useful in a multitenant cluster so that users can be assured that their private images can only be used by those who have the credentials to pull them. Without this admission controller, once an image has been pulled to a node, any pod from any user can use it simply by knowing the image’s name (assuming the Pod is scheduled onto the right node), without any authorization check against the image. When this admission controller is enabled, images are always pulled prior to starting containers, which means valid credentials are required.

AlwaysDeny

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [deprecated]

Rejects all requests. AlwaysDeny is DEPRECATED as no real meaning.

CertificateApproval

This admission controller observes requests to ‘approve’ CertificateSigningRequest resources and performs additional authorization checks to ensure the approving user has permission to approve certificate requests with the spec.signerName requested on the CertificateSigningRequest resource.

See Certificate Signing Requests for more information on the permissions required to perform different actions on CertificateSigningRequest resources.

CertificateSigning

This admission controller observes updates to the status.certificate field of CertificateSigningRequest resources and performs an additional authorization checks to ensure the signing user has permission to sign certificate requests with the spec.signerName requested on the CertificateSigningRequest resource.

See Certificate Signing Requests for more information on the permissions required to perform different actions on CertificateSigningRequest resources.

CertificateSubjectRestrictions

This admission controller observes creation of CertificateSigningRequest resources that have a spec.signerName of kubernetes.io/kube-apiserver-client. It rejects any request that specifies a ‘group’ (or ‘organization attribute’) of system:masters.

DefaultStorageClass

This admission controller observes creation of PersistentVolumeClaim objects that do not request any specific storage class and automatically adds a default storage class to them. This way, users that do not request any special storage class do not need to care about them at all and they will get the default one.

This admission controller does not do anything when no default storage class is configured. When more than one storage class is marked as default, it rejects any creation of PersistentVolumeClaim with an error and an administrator must revisit their StorageClass objects and mark only one as default. This admission controller ignores any PersistentVolumeClaim updates; it acts only on creation.

See persistent volume documentation about persistent volume claims and storage classes and how to mark a storage class as default.

DefaultTolerationSeconds

This admission controller sets the default forgiveness toleration for pods to tolerate the taints notready:NoExecute and unreachable:NoExecute based on the k8s-apiserver input parameters default-not-ready-toleration-seconds and default-unreachable-toleration-seconds if the pods don’t already have toleration for taints node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute or node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute. The default value for default-not-ready-toleration-seconds and default-unreachable-toleration-seconds is 5 minutes.

DenyExecOnPrivileged

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [deprecated]

This admission controller will intercept all requests to exec a command in a pod if that pod has a privileged container.

This functionality has been merged into DenyEscalatingExec. The DenyExecOnPrivileged admission plugin is deprecated and will be removed in v1.18.

Use of a policy-based admission plugin (like PodSecurityPolicy or a custom admission plugin) which can be targeted at specific users or Namespaces and also protects against creation of overly privileged Pods is recommended instead.

DenyEscalatingExec

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [deprecated]

This admission controller will deny exec and attach commands to pods that run with escalated privileges that allow host access. This includes pods that run as privileged, have access to the host IPC namespace, and have access to the host PID namespace.

The DenyEscalatingExec admission plugin is deprecated and will be removed in v1.18.

Use of a policy-based admission plugin (like PodSecurityPolicy or a custom admission plugin) which can be targeted at specific users or Namespaces and also protects against creation of overly privileged Pods is recommended instead.

EventRateLimit

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [alpha]

This admission controller mitigates the problem where the API server gets flooded by event requests. The cluster admin can specify event rate limits by:

  1. apiVersion: apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  3. plugins:
  4. - name: EventRateLimit
  5.   path: eventconfig.yaml
  6. ...
  1. # Deprecated in v1.17 in favor of apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. apiVersion: apiserver.k8s.io/v1alpha1
  3. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  4. plugins:
  5. - name: EventRateLimit
  6.   path: eventconfig.yaml
  7. ...

There are four types of limits that can be specified in the configuration:

  • Server: All event requests received by the API server share a single bucket.
  • Namespace: Each namespace has a dedicated bucket.
  • User: Each user is allocated a bucket.
  • SourceAndObject: A bucket is assigned by each combination of source and involved object of the event.

Below is a sample eventconfig.yaml for such a configuration:

  1. apiVersion: eventratelimit.admission.k8s.io/v1alpha1
  2. kind: Configuration
  3. limits:
  4. - type: Namespace
  5.   qps: 50
  6.   burst: 100
  7.   cacheSize: 2000
  8. - type: User
  9.   qps: 10
  10.   burst: 50

See the EventRateLimit proposal for more details.

ExtendedResourceToleration

This plug-in facilitates creation of dedicated nodes with extended resources. If operators want to create dedicated nodes with extended resources (like GPUs, FPGAs etc.), they are expected to taint the node with the extended resource name as the key. This admission controller, if enabled, automatically adds tolerations for such taints to pods requesting extended resources, so users don’t have to manually add these tolerations.

ImagePolicyWebhook

The ImagePolicyWebhook admission controller allows a backend webhook to make admission decisions.

Configuration File Format

ImagePolicyWebhook uses a configuration file to set options for the behavior of the backend. This file may be json or yaml and has the following format:

  1. imagePolicy:
  2.   kubeConfigFile: /path/to/kubeconfig/for/backend
  3.   # time in s to cache approval
  4.   allowTTL: 50
  5.   # time in s to cache denial
  6.   denyTTL: 50
  7.   # time in ms to wait between retries
  8.   retryBackoff: 500
  9.   # determines behavior if the webhook backend fails
  10.   defaultAllow: true

Reference the ImagePolicyWebhook configuration file from the file provided to the API server’s command line flag --admission-control-config-file:

  1. apiVersion: apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  3. plugins:
  4. - name: ImagePolicyWebhook
  5.   path: imagepolicyconfig.yaml
  6. ...
  1. # Deprecated in v1.17 in favor of apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. apiVersion: apiserver.k8s.io/v1alpha1
  3. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  4. plugins:
  5. - name: ImagePolicyWebhook
  6.   path: imagepolicyconfig.yaml
  7. ...

Alternatively, you can embed the configuration directly in the file:

  1. apiVersion: apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  3. plugins:
  4. - name: ImagePolicyWebhook
  5.   configuration:
  6.     imagePolicy:
  7.       kubeConfigFile: <path-to-kubeconfig-file>
  8.       allowTTL: 50
  9.       denyTTL: 50
  10.       retryBackoff: 500
  11.       defaultAllow: true
  1. # Deprecated in v1.17 in favor of apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. apiVersion: apiserver.k8s.io/v1alpha1
  3. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  4. plugins:
  5. - name: ImagePolicyWebhook
  6.   configuration:
  7.     imagePolicy:
  8.       kubeConfigFile: <path-to-kubeconfig-file>
  9.       allowTTL: 50
  10.       denyTTL: 50
  11.       retryBackoff: 500
  12.       defaultAllow: true

The ImagePolicyWebhook config file must reference a kubeconfig formatted file which sets up the connection to the backend. It is required that the backend communicate over TLS.

The kubeconfig file’s cluster field must point to the remote service, and the user field must contain the returned authorizer.

  1. # clusters refers to the remote service.
  2. clusters:
  3. - name: name-of-remote-imagepolicy-service
  4.   cluster:
  5.     certificate-authority: /path/to/ca.pem    # CA for verifying the remote service.
  6.     server: https://images.example.com/policy # URL of remote service to query. Must use 'https'.
  8. # users refers to the API server's webhook configuration.
  9. users:
  10. - name: name-of-api-server
  11.   user:
  12.     client-certificate: /path/to/cert.pem # cert for the webhook admission controller to use
  13.     client-key: /path/to/key.pem          # key matching the cert

For additional HTTP configuration, refer to the kubeconfig documentation.

Request Payloads

When faced with an admission decision, the API Server POSTs a JSON serialized imagepolicy.k8s.io/v1alpha1 ImageReview object describing the action. This object contains fields describing the containers being admitted, as well as any pod annotations that match *.image-policy.k8s.io/*.

Note that webhook API objects are subject to the same versioning compatibility rules as other Kubernetes API objects. Implementers should be aware of looser compatibility promises for alpha objects and check the “apiVersion” field of the request to ensure correct deserialization. Additionally, the API Server must enable the imagepolicy.k8s.io/v1alpha1 API extensions group (--runtime-config=imagepolicy.k8s.io/v1alpha1=true).

An example request body:

  1. {
  2.   "apiVersion":"imagepolicy.k8s.io/v1alpha1",
  3.   "kind":"ImageReview",
  4.   "spec":{
  5.     "containers":[
  6.       {
  7.         "image":"myrepo/myimage:v1"
  8.       },
  9.       {
  10.         "image":"myrepo/myimage@sha256:beb6bd6a68f114c1dc2ea4b28db81bdf91de202a9014972bec5e4d9171d90ed"
  11.       }
  12.     ],
  13.     "annotations":{
  14.       "mycluster.image-policy.k8s.io/ticket-1234": "break-glass"
  15.     },
  16.     "namespace":"mynamespace"
  17.   }
  18. }

The remote service is expected to fill the ImageReviewStatus field of the request and respond to either allow or disallow access. The response body’s “spec” field is ignored and may be omitted. A permissive response would return:

  1. {
  2.   "apiVersion": "imagepolicy.k8s.io/v1alpha1",
  3.   "kind": "ImageReview",
  4.   "status": {
  5.     "allowed": true
  6.   }
  7. }

To disallow access, the service would return:

  1. {
  2.   "apiVersion": "imagepolicy.k8s.io/v1alpha1",
  3.   "kind": "ImageReview",
  4.   "status": {
  5.     "allowed": false,
  6.     "reason": "image currently blacklisted"
  7.   }
  8. }

For further documentation refer to the imagepolicy.v1alpha1 API objects and plugin/pkg/admission/imagepolicy/admission.go.

Extending with Annotations

All annotations on a Pod that match *.image-policy.k8s.io/* are sent to the webhook. Sending annotations allows users who are aware of the image policy backend to send extra information to it, and for different backends implementations to accept different information.

Examples of information you might put here are:

  • request to “break glass” to override a policy, in case of emergency.
  • a ticket number from a ticket system that documents the break-glass request
  • provide a hint to the policy server as to the imageID of the image being provided, to save it a lookup

In any case, the annotations are provided by the user and are not validated by Kubernetes in any way. In the future, if an annotation is determined to be widely useful, it may be promoted to a named field of ImageReviewSpec.

LimitPodHardAntiAffinityTopology

This admission controller denies any pod that defines AntiAffinity topology key other than kubernetes.io/hostname in requiredDuringSchedulingRequiredDuringExecution.

LimitRanger

This admission controller will observe the incoming request and ensure that it does not violate any of the constraints enumerated in the LimitRange object in a Namespace. If you are using LimitRange objects in your Kubernetes deployment, you MUST use this admission controller to enforce those constraints. LimitRanger can also be used to apply default resource requests to Pods that don’t specify any; currently, the default LimitRanger applies a 0.1 CPU requirement to all Pods in the default namespace.

See the limitRange design doc and the example of Limit Range for more details.

MutatingAdmissionWebhook

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [beta]

This admission controller calls any mutating webhooks which match the request. Matching webhooks are called in serial; each one may modify the object if it desires.

This admission controller (as implied by the name) only runs in the mutating phase.

If a webhook called by this has side effects (for example, decrementing quota) it must have a reconciliation system, as it is not guaranteed that subsequent webhooks or validating admission controllers will permit the request to finish.

If you disable the MutatingAdmissionWebhook, you must also disable the MutatingWebhookConfiguration object in the admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1beta1 group/version via the --runtime-config flag (both are on by default in versions >= 1.9).

Use caution when authoring and installing mutating webhooks

  • Users may be confused when the objects they try to create are different from what they get back.
  • Built in control loops may break when the objects they try to create are different when read back.
    • Setting originally unset fields is less likely to cause problems than overwriting fields set in the original request. Avoid doing the latter.
  • This is a beta feature. Future versions of Kubernetes may restrict the types of mutations these webhooks can make.
  • Future changes to control loops for built-in resources or third-party resources may break webhooks that work well today. Even when the webhook installation API is finalized, not all possible webhook behaviors will be guaranteed to be supported indefinitely.

NamespaceAutoProvision

This admission controller examines all incoming requests on namespaced resources and checks if the referenced namespace does exist. It creates a namespace if it cannot be found. This admission controller is useful in deployments that do not want to restrict creation of a namespace prior to its usage.

NamespaceExists

This admission controller checks all requests on namespaced resources other than Namespace itself. If the namespace referenced from a request doesn’t exist, the request is rejected.

NamespaceLifecycle

This admission controller enforces that a Namespace that is undergoing termination cannot have new objects created in it, and ensures that requests in a non-existent Namespace are rejected. This admission controller also prevents deletion of three system reserved namespaces default, kube-system, kube-public.

A Namespace deletion kicks off a sequence of operations that remove all objects (pods, services, etc.) in that namespace. In order to enforce integrity of that process, we strongly recommend running this admission controller.

NodeRestriction

This admission controller limits the Node and Pod objects a kubelet can modify. In order to be limited by this admission controller, kubelets must use credentials in the system:nodes group, with a username in the form system:node:<nodeName>. Such kubelets will only be allowed to modify their own Node API object, and only modify Pod API objects that are bound to their node. In Kubernetes 1.11+, kubelets are not allowed to update or remove taints from their Node API object.

In Kubernetes 1.13+, the NodeRestriction admission plugin prevents kubelets from deleting their Node API object, and enforces kubelet modification of labels under the kubernetes.io/ or k8s.io/ prefixes as follows:

  • Prevents kubelets from adding/removing/updating labels with a node-restriction.kubernetes.io/ prefix. This label prefix is reserved for administrators to label their Node objects for workload isolation purposes, and kubelets will not be allowed to modify labels with that prefix.
  • Allows kubelets to add/remove/update these labels and label prefixes:
    • kubernetes.io/hostname
    • kubernetes.io/arch
    • kubernetes.io/os
    • beta.kubernetes.io/instance-type
    • node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
    • failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region (deprecated)
    • failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone (deprecated)
    • topology.kubernetes.io/region
    • topology.kubernetes.io/zone
    • kubelet.kubernetes.io/-prefixed labels
    • node.kubernetes.io/-prefixed labels

Use of any other labels under the kubernetes.io or k8s.io prefixes by kubelets is reserved, and may be disallowed or allowed by the NodeRestriction admission plugin in the future.

Future versions may add additional restrictions to ensure kubelets have the minimal set of permissions required to operate correctly.

OwnerReferencesPermissionEnforcement

This admission controller protects the access to the metadata.ownerReferences of an object so that only users with “delete” permission to the object can change it. This admission controller also protects the access to metadata.ownerReferences[x].blockOwnerDeletion of an object, so that only users with “update” permission to the finalizers subresource of the referenced owner can change it.

PersistentVolumeLabel

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [deprecated]

This admission controller automatically attaches region or zone labels to PersistentVolumes as defined by the cloud provider (for example, GCE or AWS). It helps ensure the Pods and the PersistentVolumes mounted are in the same region and/or zone. If the admission controller doesn’t support automatic labelling your PersistentVolumes, you may need to add the labels manually to prevent pods from mounting volumes from a different zone. PersistentVolumeLabel is DEPRECATED and labeling persistent volumes has been taken over by the cloud-controller-manager. Starting from 1.11, this admission controller is disabled by default.

PodNodeSelector

This admission controller defaults and limits what node selectors may be used within a namespace by reading a namespace annotation and a global configuration.

Configuration File Format

PodNodeSelector uses a configuration file to set options for the behavior of the backend. Note that the configuration file format will move to a versioned file in a future release. This file may be json or yaml and has the following format:

  1. podNodeSelectorPluginConfig:
  2.  clusterDefaultNodeSelector: name-of-node-selector
  3.  namespace1: name-of-node-selector
  4.  namespace2: name-of-node-selector

Reference the PodNodeSelector configuration file from the file provided to the API server’s command line flag --admission-control-config-file:

  1. apiVersion: apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  3. plugins:
  4. - name: PodNodeSelector
  5.   path: podnodeselector.yaml
  6. ...
  1. # Deprecated in v1.17 in favor of apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
  2. apiVersion: apiserver.k8s.io/v1alpha1
  3. kind: AdmissionConfiguration
  4. plugins:
  5. - name: PodNodeSelector
  6.   path: podnodeselector.yaml
  7. ...

Configuration Annotation Format

PodNodeSelector uses the annotation key scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/node-selector to assign node selectors to namespaces.

  1. apiVersion: v1
  2. kind: Namespace
  3. metadata:
  4.   annotations:
  5.     scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/node-selector: name-of-node-selector
  6.   name: namespace3

Internal Behavior

This admission controller has the following behavior:

  1. If the Namespace has an annotation with a key scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/node-selector, use its value as the node selector.
  2. If the namespace lacks such an annotation, use the clusterDefaultNodeSelector defined in the PodNodeSelector plugin configuration file as the node selector.
  3. Evaluate the pod’s node selector against the namespace node selector for conflicts. Conflicts result in rejection.
  4. Evaluate the pod’s node selector against the namespace-specific allowed selector defined the plugin configuration file. Conflicts result in rejection.

Note: PodNodeSelector allows forcing pods to run on specifically labeled nodes. Also see the PodTolerationRestriction admission plugin, which allows preventing pods from running on specifically tainted nodes.

PersistentVolumeClaimResize

This admission controller implements additional validations for checking incoming PersistentVolumeClaim resize requests.

Note: Support for volume resizing is available as an alpha feature. Admins must set the feature gate ExpandPersistentVolumes to true to enable resizing.

After enabling the ExpandPersistentVolumes feature gate, enabling the PersistentVolumeClaimResize admission controller is recommended, too. This admission controller prevents resizing of all claims by default unless a claim’s StorageClass explicitly enables resizing by setting allowVolumeExpansion to true.

For example: all PersistentVolumeClaims created from the following StorageClass support volume expansion:

  1. apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
  2. kind: StorageClass
  3. metadata:
  4.   name: gluster-vol-default
  5. provisioner: kubernetes.io/glusterfs
  6. parameters:
  7.   resturl: "http://192.168.10.100:8080"
  8.   restuser: ""
  9.   secretNamespace: ""
  10.   secretName: ""
  11. allowVolumeExpansion: true

For more information about persistent volume claims, see PersistentVolumeClaims.

PodPreset

This admission controller injects a pod with the fields specified in a matching PodPreset. See also PodPreset concept and Inject Information into Pods Using a PodPreset for more information.

PodSecurityPolicy

This admission controller acts on creation and modification of the pod and determines if it should be admitted based on the requested security context and the available Pod Security Policies.

See also Pod Security Policy documentation for more information.

PodTolerationRestriction

The PodTolerationRestriction admission controller verifies any conflict between tolerations of a pod and the tolerations of its namespace. It rejects the pod request if there is a conflict. It then merges the tolerations annotated on the namespace into the tolerations of the pod. The resulting tolerations are checked against a list of allowed tolerations annotated to the namespace. If the check succeeds, the pod request is admitted otherwise it is rejected.

If the namespace of the pod does not have any associated default tolerations or allowed tolerations annotated, the cluster-level default tolerations or cluster-level list of allowed tolerations are used instead if they are specified.

Tolerations to a namespace are assigned via the scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/defaultTolerations annotation key. The list of allowed tolerations can be added via the scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/tolerationsWhitelist annotation key.

Example for namespace annotations:

  1. apiVersion: v1
  2. kind: Namespace
  3. metadata:
  4.   name: apps-that-need-nodes-exclusively
  5.   annotations:
  6.     scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/defaultTolerations: '[{"operator": "Exists", "effect": "NoSchedule", "key": "dedicated-node"}]'
  7.     scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/tolerationsWhitelist: '[{"operator": "Exists", "effect": "NoSchedule", "key": "dedicated-node"}]'

Priority

The priority admission controller uses the priorityClassName field and populates the integer value of the priority. If the priority class is not found, the Pod is rejected.

ResourceQuota

This admission controller will observe the incoming request and ensure that it does not violate any of the constraints enumerated in the ResourceQuota object in a Namespace. If you are using ResourceQuota objects in your Kubernetes deployment, you MUST use this admission controller to enforce quota constraints.

See the resourceQuota design doc and the example of Resource Quota for more details.

RuntimeClass

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.20 [stable]

If you enable the PodOverhead feature gate, and define a RuntimeClass with Pod overhead configured, this admission controller checks incoming Pods. When enabled, this admission controller rejects any Pod create requests that have the overhead already set. For Pods that have a RuntimeClass is configured and selected in their .spec, this admission controller sets .spec.overhead in the Pod based on the value defined in the corresponding RuntimeClass.

Note: The .spec.overhead field for Pod and the .overhead field for RuntimeClass are both in beta. If you do not enable the PodOverhead feature gate, all Pods are treated as if .spec.overhead is unset.

See also Pod Overhead for more information.

SecurityContextDeny

This admission controller will deny any pod that attempts to set certain escalating SecurityContext fields, as shown in the Configure a Security Context for a Pod or Container task. This should be enabled if a cluster doesn’t utilize pod security policies to restrict the set of values a security context can take.

ServiceAccount

This admission controller implements automation for serviceAccounts. We strongly recommend using this admission controller if you intend to make use of Kubernetes ServiceAccount objects.

StorageObjectInUseProtection

The StorageObjectInUseProtection plugin adds the kubernetes.io/pvc-protection or kubernetes.io/pv-protection finalizers to newly created Persistent Volume Claims (PVCs) or Persistent Volumes (PV). In case a user deletes a PVC or PV the PVC or PV is not removed until the finalizer is removed from the PVC or PV by PVC or PV Protection Controller. Refer to the Storage Object in Use Protection for more detailed information.

TaintNodesByCondition

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.12 [beta]

This admission controller taints newly created Nodes as NotReady and NoSchedule. That tainting avoids a race condition that could cause Pods to be scheduled on new Nodes before their taints were updated to accurately reflect their reported conditions.

ValidatingAdmissionWebhook

FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.13 [beta]

This admission controller calls any validating webhooks which match the request. Matching webhooks are called in parallel; if any of them rejects the request, the request fails. This admission controller only runs in the validation phase; the webhooks it calls may not mutate the object, as opposed to the webhooks called by the MutatingAdmissionWebhook admission controller.

If a webhook called by this has side effects (for example, decrementing quota) it must have a reconciliation system, as it is not guaranteed that subsequent webhooks or other validating admission controllers will permit the request to finish.

If you disable the ValidatingAdmissionWebhook, you must also disable the ValidatingWebhookConfiguration object in the admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1beta1 group/version via the --runtime-config flag (both are on by default in versions 1.9 and later).

Is there a recommended set of admission controllers to use?

Yes. For Kubernetes version 1.10 and later, the recommended admission controllers are enabled by default (shown here), so you do not need to explicitly specify them. You can enable additional admission controllers beyond the default set using the --enable-admission-plugins flag (order doesn’t matter).

Note: --admission-control was deprecated in 1.10 and replaced with --enable-admission-plugins.

For Kubernetes 1.9 and earlier, we recommend running the following set of admission controllers using the --admission-control flag (order matters).

  • v1.9

    1. --admission-control=NamespaceLifecycle,LimitRanger,ServiceAccount,DefaultStorageClass,DefaultTolerationSeconds,MutatingAdmissionWebhook,ValidatingAdmissionWebhook,ResourceQuota

    • It’s worth reiterating that in 1.9, these happen in a mutating phase and a validating phase, and that for example ResourceQuota runs in the validating phase, and therefore is the last admission controller to run. MutatingAdmissionWebhook appears before it in this list, because it runs in the mutating phase.

      For earlier versions, there was no concept of validating versus mutating and the admission controllers ran in the exact order specified.